Where to buy robot dragonfly

Skip to main content. About this product. Make an offer:. Brand new: Lowest price The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. See all 3 brand new listings. Buy It Now. Add to cart. About this product Product Identifiers Brand. Show More Show Less. Any Condition Any Condition. See all 7 - All listings for this product.

Use the Dragonfly indoors or outdoors, controlling its speed, direction and height with the digital proportional remote. Features:Unique indoor flyer - capable of maneuvering in tight spaces, FlyTech Dragonfly brings radio-controlled flight into your home.

Innovative flying action - Based on an ornithopter design, Dragonfly flaps its wings and takes off from any smooth surface.

It can soar, dive-bomb, hover and glide for soft landings. Strong and flexible - Built from a durable carbon-fiber structure, its flexible body and wings can take a lot of punishment. Ultra-light design - Lightweight design protects home interiors. Light-up LED eyes - Its eyes alert you of the Dragonfly's status by blinking, pulsing, or shining bright. Two-channel digital proportional remote - Use the remote to control wing speed and tail rotor speed.

Remote also doubles as charging base. The experiments in the next section with the optimized controllers will give us a better understanding about the real stability and performance of the dragonfly flight. The first attempt to control our system will be changing the wing speed velocity, angle of attack and tail rotations accordingly to the position error Figure In order to analyze the previous control diagram we need to understand the behavior of our system for certain variations of the error in this case, the position error.

The wing speed inevitably depends on the sum of the position errors in and -axes being limited to a minimum and maximum saturation which in turn is associated to the simulated model. The Left wing and Right wing Angles of Attack are what will allow the execution of different maneuvers e. To this result we add two references: a reference value being the value considered to be ideal, so the model can follow a path without deviation from the xy -plane straight path and the position error in the z -axis error elevation to ensure that the model can follow the desired trajectory e.

The Tail Azimuth angle will depend on a function which depends on the position error in x -axis and in the y -axis. This angle is only intended to assist the rotation maneuvers. The nonlinear function will systematically adjust the angle of azimuth of the tail in order to adjust the actual position on the xy -plane.

For example, if the dragonfly turns left i. In this paper we will compare the performance of the integer and fractional order FO PID controllers. FO controllers are algorithms whose dynamic behavior is described through differential equations of non integer order. Contrary to the classical PID , where we have three gains to adjust, the FO PID , also known as , has five tuning parameters, including the derivative and the integral orders to improve the design flexibility.

For the implementation of the given by we adopt a 4th-order discrete-time Pade approximations in the -Domain. To find a local minimum of a function of the position error using gradient descent, one takes steps proportional to the negative of the gradient or the approximate gradient of the function at the current point.

The first attempt to control our system will be changing the wing speed velocity, angle of attack, and tail rotations accordingly with the cartesian position error. In order to study the system response to perturbations, during the experiment we apply, separately, rectangular pulses, at the references. In this optimization, the use of a controller in the y -axis is unnecessary since there will be no movement in this axis; therefore, we will ignore it for now.

Let us then compare the PID and controllers. Under the last conditions we obtained the PID and controller parameters depicted in Table 3. To analyze more clearly the dynamical response to the step perturbation we subtract the dynamic response without perturbation to the step dynamic response with perturbation under the action of both PID and algorithms Figure We can see that the FO algorithm leads to a reduction of the overshoot, at the cost of a slight increase of the algorithm.

The functionalities presented in this work are implemented in a simulation platform. We obtain satisfactory results proving that the development of the kinematical and dynamic model can lead to the implementation of an artificial machine with a behavior close to the dragonfly. The design methodology and implementation can be deemed successful in this project. By obtaining a balance between physical modeling and the objective of animation, a strong advance in the system design has been achieved.

Despite all simplifications, our model is still incomplete, and further research needs to be conducted to explore additional abstractions. Couceiro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of , as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles. Journal overview. Special Issues. Couceiro, 1 N. Fonseca Ferreira , 1 and J. Academic Editor: Seul Jung. Received 19 Dec Revised 31 Mar Accepted 10 Jun Published 25 Jul Abstract Dragonflies demonstrate unique and superior flight performances than most of the other insect species and birds.

Introduction The study of dynamic models based on insects is becoming popular and shows results that may be considered very close to reality [ 1 , 2 ]. State of the Art Inspired by the unique characteristics of animals, researchers have placed a great emphasis on the development of biological robots. Figure 1. Sequence of images illustrating the wings-beat of the robotic bird SIRB. Figure 2. Table 1. Table 2. Figure 3. Chart obtained through the developed simulator that shows the difference between the trajectory accomplished by a great skua very large bird , a seagull large bird and a dragonfly.

The stability of this last one when compared to the others is undeniable. Figure 4. Dragonfly gliding straight—changing the weight. Angle of attack versus time.

Figure 5. Velocity versus time. Figure 6. Dragonfly gliding straight—changing the wing area. Figure 7. Figure 8. Dragonfly gliding down—changing the weight. Figure 9. Distance versus time. Figure Dragonfly gliding down—changing the wing area.

Dragonfly flapping straight—changing the weight. Dragonfly flapping straight—changing the wing area. Table 3. PID and controller parameters. Table 4. Time response parameters of the system under the action of the PID and controllers. References L. Schenato, X. Deng, W.